Disposed

Anuj Kumar and 2 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC18 Dec 2025A482/10771/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The applicants sought quashing of criminal proceedings based on a compromise. The Court disposed of the application by directing the trial court to verify the compromise personally, after which applicants may seek quashing again.

What did the court decide?

Disposed with direction to trial court to verify compromise; no coercive action for one month.

Anuj Kumar and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru… — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10771 of 2025

¶3

Anuj Kumar And 2 Others

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Parijat Singh, Kushagra Singh, Poornima Singh, Yogesh Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶7

Court No. - 14

¶8

HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.

¶9

Sri Pankaj Kumar Singh, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party nos.2 and 3, which is taken on record.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for opposite party nos.2 and 3 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶11

The instant application has been filed with the following prayer:-

¶12

"To set aside the entire criminal proceedings of Case No.0568 of 2017 "State Vs Anuj Kumar & Others" pending in the Court of Ld. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow arising out of Case Crime No.0568 of 2017,u/s 420, 147, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C, Police Station- Chinhat, District-Lucknow and Summoning Order dated 08.12.2022 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate III, Lucknow and Charge Sheet dated 16.09.2019."

¶13

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.5 to the application.

¶14

Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to

¶15

A482 No. 10771 of 2025

¶16

¶17

be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court.

¶18

Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record.

¶19

The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings.

¶20

For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.

¶21

Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if any, to the learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same.

¶22

(Rajeev Singh,J.)

¶23

December 18, 2025

¶24

Arpan

¶25

Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Anuj Kumar and 2 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anuj Kumar and 2 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Enulhasan @ Mizzan and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home U.P. Lko. and Another

Ramchandra and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Mohd. Kaleem and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Govt. U.P. Civil Sectt. Lko. and Another

Ram Vilas and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Another

Badashah Khan @ Shabbu Shah Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Sayyad Ali Vs the State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 2 Others