Nadeem Khan v. State of Up Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Listing order in a Section 482 application; none appeared for the parties, the State's counsel was present, and the court directed the matter to be listed again with a warning that it would be decided on merits if parties failed to appear.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1075 of 2024
Nadeem Khan
.....Applicant(s)
Versus State Of Up Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sarvesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Abhishek Gupta, G.A., Rajesh Babu
Court No. - 81
HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.
- List revised.
- None appear for the parties.
- Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
- If on the next date, the parties do not appear, the application will be decided on merits.
- List in due course.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Nadeem Khan
- respondent
State Of Up
Coram
Avnish Saxena
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/1075/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Manoj Baja
- Order 2 · Manoj Baja
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court