Applicants sought quashing of an order registering a Domestic Violence Act case against them. The High Court found the trial court had merely registered the case and fixed it for hearing, with no summons issued or cognizance taken, and rejected the application as misconceived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10617 of 2024
Mohammad Tayyab And 2 Others
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abdul Samad, Divya Singh, Sunil Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 16
HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
(Brij Raj Singh,J.)
November 12, 2025
Rao/-
Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Section 482 petition lies to quash proceedings where the trial court had only registered the case under Section 12 DV Act without issuing summons or taking cognizance.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohammad Tayyab And 2 Others
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.
Shama Praveen
Brij Raj Singh
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
