Dismissed¶3
Vinay Kumar Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another
Allahabad HCA482/10344/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Section 482 CrPC second application dismissed as not maintainable; maintainability contested on the strength of Supreme Court judgment Bhisham Lal Verma v State of U.P. (2024) 15 SCC 282; applicant Vinay Kumar Singh v State of U.P. and another; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench, Court No. 29; single judge bench of Dr. Gautam Chowdhary; decided December 12, 2025; counsel for applicant: Durgesh Mishra, Manvendra Mishra; AGA Rao Narendra Singh / G.A. for opposite parties.
What did the court decide?
Learned counsel for the applicant could not dispute the submission (advanced by the learned A.G.A. with reference to the Apex Court judgment in Bhisham Lal Verma, 2024 (15) SCC 282) that the instant second application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is not maintainable. ¶2