Disposed¶14

Pramila v. Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya and 6 Others

Allahabad HC27 Feb 2025A227/86/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Article 227 petition for expeditious disposal of revision under Section 333 U.P. Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Act. High Court directs lower authority to decide pending revision expeditiously without unnecessary adjournments, without expressing opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.1 to decide Revision Case No.00144/2020 expeditiously without unnecessary adjournments ¶14

Why is it important?

Pramila Vs Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya and 6 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:11841

¶2

Court No. - 8

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 86 of 2025

¶4

Petitioner :- Pramila Respondent :- Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vivek Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh

¶5

Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondents Nos.1 to 4 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel.

¶7

In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondent Nos.5 to 7 is dispensed with.

¶8

By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of Revision Case No.00144/2020, Computerized Case No.20200400000144, under Section 333 of the U.P.ZA & L.R.Act pending before the respondent No.1.

¶9

It is submitted that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the case has not yet been decided.

¶10

Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.

¶11

Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and decide the pending Revision No.00144/2020 (supra) most expeditiously, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably as expeditiously as possible.

¶12

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the

¶13

Court concerned shall consider and decide the case of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law.

¶14

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of .

¶15

Order Date :- 27.2.2025

¶16

Shukla

¶17

Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Pramila v. Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

Pramila v. Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sursati Vs Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Lalganj, Pratapgarh and Others

Zahira Bano @ Zahida Khatoon Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. and Others

Santosh Pal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. and Others

Susheela and 3 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Revenue and 2 Others

Pramila vs Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya and 6 Others

Farhat Ali Siddiqui vs Cooperative Tribunal U.P. India Bhawan Thru. Its Chairman Lko and 4 Others