Gaurav Verma v. State of U.P. and Another
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:80185
Court No. - 81
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 722 of 2025
Petitioner :- Gaurav Verma Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Sarvesh
Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla,J.
Counter affidavit filed by learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 is taken on record.
Heard Sri Sanjay Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State, Sri Sarvesh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 and perused the record.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press the petition, therefore, the same may be dismissed as not pressed.
Learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 has no objection.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Gaurav Verma
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Respondent No. 2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- A227/722/2025
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court