Petitioner sought direction to Additional Commissioner to decide a pending appeal under U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously, citing delay beyond the statutory timeline.
Directed Additional Commissioner to decide appeal within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6986 of 2025
Santram Giri
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others
| ep., o. n ers | .....Respondent(s) |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Sachin Pandey |
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey |
Court No. - 22
HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.
“A. Issue an order or direction to the Additional Commissioner, Judicial, First, Lucknow Division, Lucknow/respondent no.07 to decide the case no. 4001/2024 (Computerized no. C202410000004001) U/S-207, U.P. Revenue Code 2006, (Ram Singh Vs Santram Giri and Others), which is pending since 03.10.2024, within the time specified by this Hon'ble Court.
B. Issue an order or direction to allow the petitioner for cultivation over the property in question as the petitioner is recorded tenure holder of the property in question which is evident from the Khatauni in the interest of justice.”
A227 No. 6986 of 2025
2
(Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.)
December 2, 2025 S.C.
Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM CHAURASIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Santram Giri
State Of U.P
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
