Virendra Kumar Verma @ Shanti Bhushan Singh v. Harishankar Singh and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Article 227 petition (A227 No. 6515 of 2025), High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Court No. 19, decided 17.11.2025 by Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, J. Petitioner Virendra Kumar Verma @ Shanti Bhushan Singh (counsel: Mahendra Pratap Singh); respondents Harishankar Singh and another (no counsel listed). Relates to Original Suit No. 168 of 2023 before Additional Civil Judge (S.D.) F.T.C., Court No. 48, Barabanki; ad-interim injunction under Order 9 Rule 3 C.P.C.; application for temporary injunction No. 6-C pending over two and a half years. Held: court below directed to decide application 6-C expeditiously, preferably within two months of filing certified copy of order; writ petition disposed of. Statutes referenced: Article 227, Constitution of India; Order 9 Rule 3 C.P.C. No precedents cited.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the learned Additional Civil Judge (S.D.) F.T.C., Court No. 48, Barabanki to hear and decide application 6-C filed by the plaintiff-respondent as expeditiously as possible, preferably within two months from the date of filing of a certified copy of the order; writ petition disposed of.