Petitioners sought directions to the Civil Judge (J.D.), Chunar to decide Original Suit No. 247 of 2014 and a 6C application expeditiously. The court declined the first prayer following Division Bench precedent, but directed disposal of the 6C application within two months, at admission stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:3999
Court No. - 9
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 65 of 2025
Petitioner :- Lal Bahadur Singh And 4 Others Respondent :- Ram Asare Singh And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jai Shankar Mishra,Krishn Kumar,Shardendu Mishra
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
(ii) To direct the learned court of Civil Judge (J.D.) Chunar, Mirzapur to decide the 6C application within a short period fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
Order Date :- 8.1.2025 V.S.Singh
Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the trial court could be directed to decide the suit within a fixed period.
Whether a direction can issue for expeditious disposal of the 6C application.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ali Shad Usmani vs. Ali IstebaRelied on¶2
2015 (2) ADJ 250 (DB)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lal Bahadur Singh And 4 Others
Ram Asare Singh And 7 Others
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
