Umesh Chandra Maurya v. Sardar Santosh Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition under Article 227 challenging condonation of a 2561-day delay in filing an appeal. Court heard counsel, found the matter requires consideration, issued notice to the respondent and stayed further proceedings of the Regular Civil Appeal until the next date.
What did the court decide?
Notice to respondent; further proceedings of Regular Civil Appeal No. 43 of 2025 stayed till next date.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6298 of 2025
Umesh Chandra Maurya
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Sardar Santosh Singh Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shiv Nath Tilhari Counsel for Respondent(s) :
.....Respondent(s)
Court No. - 20
HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J.
- Heard Shri S.N. Tilahari, learned counsel for petitioner and perused the material available on record.
- By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for setting aside order dated 20.08.2025 passed by learned District Judge, Barabanki in MCC No. 109 of 2025 (Sardar Santosh Singh Vs. Umesh Chandra Maurya).
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Umesh Chandra Maurya
- respondent
Sardar Santosh Singh
Coram
Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- A227/6298/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Alok Mathur
- Order 2 · Alok Mathur
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court