Disposed¶16

Babu Ram v. District Magistrate, Sultanpur and Another

Allahabad HC17 Oct 2025A227/6224/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Expedite order; expeditious disposal of pending proceedings; Case No.4140 of 2025; Case No.D202504680004140; direction to respondent No.2 to conclude case promptly with full hearing opportunity and no unnecessary adjournments; no examination on merits; matters under Article 227; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; Babu Ram v. District Magistrate, Sultanpur; decided October 17, 2025; single-judge bench (Jaspreet Singh, J.).

What did the court decide?

Expedite direction to respondent No.2 to consider and finally decide pending Case No.4140 of 2025; Case No.D202504680004140 as expeditiously as possible, with full opportunity of hearing and without unnecessary adjournments; no adjudication on merits. ¶16

Babu Ram Vs District Magistrate, Sultanpur and Another — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6224 of 2025

Babu Ram

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

District Magistrate, Sultanpur And Another

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Rajesh Kumar Shukla
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C.

¶9

Court No. - 6

¶10

HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J.

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 and 2 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel.

¶12

By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of his Case No.4140 of 2025; Case No.D202504680004140 pending before the respondent No.2.

¶13

Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.

¶14

Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.2 to consider and finally decide the pending proceedings of Case No.4140 of 2025; Case No.D202504680004140 as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

¶15

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.

¶16

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of .

¶17

October 17, 2025

¶18

Harshita

¶19

(Jaspreet Singh,J.)

¶20

Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Babu Ram v. District Magistrate, Sultanpur and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Babu Ram v. District Magistrate, Sultanpur and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

M/S Radhey Narayan Industries Private Limited, Barabanki Thru. Director Shri Udit Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. / Addl. Chief Secy., State Tax, Lko. and 2 Others

Sitanshu Shekhar Tiwari Vs U.P. Zila Adhikari, Mandal Devi Patanl, Tehsil Utraula Balrampur and Others

Suhel Ahmad Khan and 2 Others Vs Shoyab Mustafa and 14 Others

Harinam Singh and 4 Others Vs Additional Commissioner, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya and Others

Ramesh Kumar @ Ramesh Kumar Yadav Vs Board of Revenue, Lucknow Division, Lucknow Thru. Chairman and Others

Rajendra Prasad Vs Consolidation Officer, Milkipur, Ayodhya and Others