Disposed

M/S Autonix Auto Industries Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Authorized Representative Mr. Biplov Kumar Mandal v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Infra. and Industrial Development Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC25 Sept 2025A227/5867/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed to direct the State to decide a pending revision petition. Court disposed of the matter by directing the State to decide the revision petition within eight weeks and the interim relief application within three weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to State to decide revision petition within eight weeks and interim relief application within three weeks.

M/S Autonix Auto Industries Pvt. Ltd. Thru… — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5867 of 2025

¶3

M/S Autonix Auto Industries Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Authorized Representative Mr. Biplov Kumar Mandal .....Petitioner(s)

¶4

Versus

¶5

State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Infra. And Industrial Development Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Navneet Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sanjeev Singh

¶6

Court No. - 7

¶7

HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J.

¶8

Vakalatnama filed by Shri Gaurav Mehrotra, Advocate on behalf of respondent no.2 today in Court is taken on record.

¶9

Heard Sri Navnnet Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of respondent no.1 has been accepted by the office of Chief Standing counsel. Sri Gaurav Mehrotra, learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent No.2.

¶10

By means of this writ petition, prayer has been made for directing respondent No.1 i.e. the State to decide the revision petition said to have been preferred by the petitioner, dated 25.07.2025, expeditiously.

¶11

Having regard to the innocuous nature of prayer made in this petition, the writ petition is disposed off with the consent of parties with direction to respondent No.1 to decide the revision petition preferred by the petitioner within eight weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order in accordance with law.

¶12

It is also provided that the application dated 25.07.2025 seeking grant of interim relief moved by the petitioner shall also be decided within a period of three weeks from today, and till the decision of the application for interim relief, no coercive action shall be taken by the

¶13

A227 No. 5867 of 2025

¶14

¶15

respondents.

¶16

It is made clear that on passing of appropriate orders in the revision as directed above, the protection granted by this Court shall cease to operate.

¶17

September 25, 2025 Mahesh

¶18

(Jaspreet Singh,J.)

¶19

Digitally signed by :- MAHESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

M/S Autonix Auto Industries Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Authorized Representative Mr. Biplov Kumar Mandal v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Infra. and Industrial Development Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Autonix Auto Industries Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Authorized Representative Mr. Biplov Kumar Mandal v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Infra. and Industrial Development Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Ramkumari and Ors. Vs Mohd. Shafiq and Another

The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Having Its Registered Vs Smt. Sushila and Ors.

Sunita Singh and Ors. Vs Tirkha Singh and Another

M/S Autonix Auto Industries Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Authorized Representative Mr. Biplov Kumar Mandal vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Infra. and Industrial Development Lko. and Another

Rayees Bano vs Rajneesh Kumar Tripathi and Another

Praveen Kumar Khare and Another vs Debts Recovery Tribunal Lko. and Another