Disposed¶17

Ashok Kumar v. Civil Judge J.D. Haweli Ayodhya and 2 Others

Allahabad HC22 Sept 2025A227/5696/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench), Matters Under Article 227 No. 5696 of 2025, Ashok Kumar v. Civil Judge J.D. Haweli Ayodhya & 2 Others, Jaspreet Singh, J., 22.09.2025: direction for expeditious final disposal of recall application Misc. Case no.105 of 2013 pending before Civil Judge J.D., Haweli Ayodhya; full opportunity of hearing, no unnecessary adjournments; merits not examined; petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.1 to consider and finally decide the recall application (Misc. Case no.105 of 2013) as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties; merits left open to be decided strictly in accordance with law. ¶17

Ashok Kumar Vs Civil Judge J.D. Haweli Ayodhya… — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5696 of 2025

Ashok Kumar

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

Civil Judge J.D. Haweli Ayodhya And 2 Others

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Awnish Kumar,	Ram Jeet Dubey
Counsel for Respondent(s)	:

¶9

Court No. - 7

¶10

HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J.

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel.

¶12

In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondents is dispensed with.

¶13

By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of the recall application registered as Misc. Case no.105 of 2013 pending before the respondent No.1.

¶14

Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.

¶15

Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and finally decide the recall application registered as Misc. Case no.105 of 2013 as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

¶16

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.

¶17

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of . September 22, 2025 Harshita

¶18

(Jaspreet Singh,J.)

¶19

Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ashok Kumar v. Civil Judge J.D. Haweli Ayodhya and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Kumar v. Civil Judge J.D. Haweli Ayodhya and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Sabhajeet Singh and Another Vs National Highway Authority of India Thru. Project Director and Others

Dr. Vikram Mehta Vs Court of Civil Judge (S.D.) Malihibad Lko. and Another

Ram Niwas Patel S/O Faujdar Chaudhary Vs Bhandari Lal Chaudhary S/O Faujdar Chaudhary and Anr.

Shiv Kumar Singh vs Ram Dular Singh and 11 Others

Ashok Kumar vs Civil Judge J.D. Haweli Ayodhya and 2 Others

Shiv Kumar Pandey @ Shiv Kumar and 3 Others vs Laxmi Dutt Pandey and 2 Others