Vivek v. Nayab Tahsildar Jahangirganj, Tahsil Alapur, Ambedkar Nagar and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Article 227 expedite-disposal petition seeking direction to respondent no. 1 Nayab Tehsildar, Jahangirganj, to speedily decide pending Case No. T 202504040400044 (Vivek and Others v. Banshilal) under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006; Court declined interference at this stage and disposed of the petition; liberty granted to file urgency application within two weeks, to be considered and decided within three weeks thereafter; merits not examined; decided September 9, 2025 by Alok Mathur, J.; counsel: Sri Pankaj Kumar Shukla for petitioner, C.S.C. for State respondents; no precedents engaged.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to the petitioner to move an urgency application before the Court concerned within two weeks, to be considered and decided within three weeks thereafter, with further action per law if urgency is established; no substantive direction issued to the Nayab Tehsildar.