Disposed¶16

Ram Veryani v. Addl. Distt. Judge Court No. 11 Lko. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC4 Sept 2025A227/5186/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Article 227 petition (MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No.-5186 of 2025) by Ram Veryani for expedited final decision of Regular Civil Appeal no.239 of 2018 pending before Addl. Distt. Judge Court No. 11, Lucknow (respondent No.1); Jaspreet Singh, J.; direction to dispose appeal expeditiously, full hearing, no unnecessary adjournments, merits not examined; disposed of September 4, 2025.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.1 to consider and finally decide Regular Civil Appeal no.239 of 2018 as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing without unnecessary adjournments; petition disposed of without examination of merits. ¶16

Ram Veryani Vs Addl. Distt. Judge Court No. 11… — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶16

Issue for consideration

Whether respondent No.1 should be directed to consider and finally decide the pending Regular Civil Appeal no.239 of 2018 as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing without unnecessary adjournments.

¶12

Court's answer

Ends of justice are served by directing respondent No.1 to consider and finally decide the pending proceedings of Regular Civil Appeal no.239 of 2018 as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties but without granting unnecessary adjournments, provided there is no legal impediment and the parties cooperate.

¶14

Ratio / Principle

This Court did not examine the case of either party on merits; the authority concerned remains free to decide the appeal strictly in accordance with law.

¶15

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench), Jaspreet Singh, J. — Matters Under Article 227 No.-5186 of 2025 (Ram Veryani v. Addl. Distt. Judge Court No. 11 Lko. and 2 Others), decided September 4, 2025: petitioner sought expeditious disposal of Regular Civil Appeal no.239 of 2018 pending before respondent No.1. Court directed respondent No.1 to consider and finally decide the appeal as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties but without granting unnecessary adjournments, subject to absence of legal impediment and cooperation of the parties. The Court expressly clarified it had not examined the merits of either side and the authority remained free to decide strictly in accordance with law. Notice to the private respondent was dispensed with; notice for respondent No.1 was accepted by the Office of the Chief Standing Counsel. Petition disposed of.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5186 of 2025

Ram Veryani

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

Addl. Distt. Judge Court No. 11 Lko. And 2 Others

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Saima Khan, Priya Bharti
Counsel for Respondent(s)	:
Court No.- 7

¶9

HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondent No.1 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel.

¶11

In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the privaterespondent is dispensed with.

¶12

By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of the Regular Civil Appeal no.239 of 2018 pending before the respondent No.1.

¶13

Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed.

¶14

Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and finally decide the pending proceedings of the Regular Civil Appeal no.239 of 2018 as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties provided there is on legal impediment and parties shall cooperate in the proceedings.

¶15

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.

¶16

With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of . September 4, 2025 Harshita

¶17

(Jaspreet Singh,J.)

¶18

Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ram Veryani v. Addl. Distt. Judge Court No. 11 Lko. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Veryani v. Addl. Distt. Judge Court No. 11 Lko. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

M/S Jindal Restaurants Thru. Its Authorised Signatory Shri Ujjwal Gupta Vs Debts Recovery Tribunal 600/1 Thru. Presiding Officer Lko. and 5 Others

Manna Lal and Another Vs Addl. Distt. Judge Court No. 1 Unnao and 5 Others

Gyani vs Shri R.K. Choudhary

Dharmesh Bahadur Singh Vs Civil Judge Senior Division Raebareli and 5 Others

Rajendra Kumar Vs Shitla Prasad and 2 Others

Ram Sulochan Chauhan @ Sulochan Vs Civil Judge Court No. 21 Sultanpur and 5 Others