Disposed¶16

Chandrakali @ Kamla and Another v. Addl. Civil Judge No (J.D.) Court No 34 Lko. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC28 Aug 2025A227/5104/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Expedited disposal of trial; Article 227 jurisdiction; delay and adjournments; Regular Suit No. 201 of 2022; Chandrakali @ Kamla; Dinesh Kumar; Additional Civil Judge (J.D.) Court No 34 Lucknow; MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 5104 of 2025; Jaspreet Singh, J.; petition disposed; no merits examined; decided August 28, 2025; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; Kulbhushan Singh Sikarwar for petitioners.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the court concerned (Additional Civil Judge (J.D.), Court No. 34, Lucknow) to decide Regular Suit No. 201 of 2022 most expeditiously, with full opportunity of hearing and without unnecessary adjournments, strictly in accordance with law; no observation on merits. ¶16

Chandrakali @ Kamla and Another Vs Addl… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5104 of 2025

¶3

Chandrakali @ Kamla And Another

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

Addl. Civil Judge No (J.D.) Others	Court No 34	Lko. And 2 .....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s)	:	Kulbhushan Singh Sikarwar
Counsel for Respondent(s)	:

¶7

Court No. - 7

¶8

HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J.

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel representing the State-opposite party.

¶10

By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of Civil Suit bearing Regular Suit No. 201 of 2022, Chandrakali @ Kamla and other Vs. Dinesh Kumar and Other pending before the Additional Civil Judge (J.D.), Court No. 34, Lucknow.

¶11

It is submitted that though a large number of dates have been fixed, for reasons beyond control, the aforesaid case has not yet been decided.

¶12

Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending. Rather, ends of justice can be served by directing the court concerned to consider and decide the Civil Suit bearing Regular Suit No. 201 of 2022, Chandrakali @ Kamla and other Vs. Dinesh Kumar and Other, most expeditiously, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, preferably as expeditiously as possible.

¶13

It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the court concerned shall consider and decide the case of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law.

¶14

A227 No. 5104 of 2025

¶15

¶16

With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of .

¶17

(Jaspreet Singh,J.)

¶18

August 28, 2025

¶19

Anurag

¶20

Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Chandrakali @ Kamla and Another v. Addl. Civil Judge No (J.D.) Court No 34 Lko. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandrakali @ Kamla and Another v. Addl. Civil Judge No (J.D.) Court No 34 Lko. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shyam Badadur Yadav Vs Jaykaran and 4 Others

Neval Singh @ Neval Vs Addl. Civil Judge (Junior Division) II Unnao and 3 Others

Ram Avadh @ Ram Avadh Tiwari Vs Civil Judge (Junior Division) Kunda Pratapgarh and Another

Dinesh Kumar and Others Vs Smt. Munni Devi and 6 Others

Dr. Shyam Narain Gupta Vs Civil Judge Senior Division Mohanlalganj Lko. and 3 Others

Sunil Kumar Singh Vs Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Kadipur Distt. Sultanpur and Another