Disposed

Smt. Nattho v. Consolidation Officer, Safipur, Unnao and Others

Allahabad HC20 Aug 2025A227/4927/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court at Lucknow, in a writ petition under Article 227, dispensed with notice to private respondents. The court directed the Consolidation Officer to decide Case No. 125 of 2025 under Section 9A(2) of the Consolidation of Holdings Act within six months, ensuring expeditious disposal without unnecessary adjournments.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Consolidation Officer to decide Case No. 125 of 2025 under Section 9A(2) of the Consolidation of Holdings Act within six months without unnecessary adjournments.

Smt. Nattho Vs Consolidation Officer, Safipur, Unnao and… — Land Acquisition | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48798

¶2

Court No. - 5

¶3

Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4927 of 2025

¶4

Petitioner :- Smt. Nattho

¶5

Respondent :- Consolidation Officer, Safipur, Unnao And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nouphil Ahmad,Syed Ahmad Jamal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶6

Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.

¶8

In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with.

¶9

Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Consolidation Officer, Safipur, Unnao to decide Case No. 125 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. 202554106940030087) - Smt. Nattho Vs. Munni, U/S 9A(2) of the Consolidation of Holdings Act, expeditiously.

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Consolidation Officer, Safipur, Unnao, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.

¶11

Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

¶12

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Consolidation Officer, Safipur, Unnao, is directed to decide Case No. 125 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. 202554106940030087) - Smt. Nattho Vs. Munni, U/S 9A(2) of the Consolidation of Holdings Act, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.

¶13

It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.

¶14

With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of .

¶15

Order Date :- 20.8.2025

¶16

A. Verma

¶17

(Alok Mathur, J.)

¶18

Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Smt. Nattho v. Consolidation Officer, Safipur, Unnao and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Nattho v. Consolidation Officer, Safipur, Unnao and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Prashant Kumar Vs Settlement Officer Consolidation Lakhimpur Kheri and Ors.

Mayank Pandey Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. and 2 Others

Om Prakash and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Chairman, Board of Revenue, U.P. Lko. and and 4 Others

Shambhu Mishra and Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. and Others

Smt. Nattho vs Consolidation Officer, Safipur, Unnao and Others

M/S Puneet Agencies Thru. Prop.Puneet Agrawal Gstin 09TIN-09AEDPA5275J1ZG vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Tax and Registration Lko. and 3 Others