Priyanka Agarwal Thru. Her Power of Attorney Holder Mr. Satya Bhushan Agarwal v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Housing and Urban Planning Deptt. Lko. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Article 227 petition (MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1700 of 2025, Neutral Citation 2025:AHC-LKO:19555), Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench, Pankaj Bhatia J., 8.4.2025. Cause of action / jurisdiction: orders passed by authority sitting at Noida; execution proceedings pending at Noida; petitioner residing at Ghaziabad; RERA Authority Chairman sits at Lucknow; court held no part of cause of action arises at Lucknow warranting interference; petition disposed off; liberty to approach Allahabad High Court for same relief. Parties: Priyanka Agarwal (POA holder Satya Bhushan Agarwal) v. State of U.P. (Prin. Secy. Housing and Urban Planning Deptt.) and 2 others. Counsel: Harish Pandey, Sagun Chandra Rastogi, Vijay Kumar Pandey; C.S.C.; Shobhit Mohan Shukla; Prashant Chandra (Sr. Adv.); Prashant Kumar Singh.
What did the court decide?
Liberty given to the petitioner to approach Allahabad High Court for the same relief