Disposed¶8

Dinesh v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC18 Jul 2025A227/1217/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Article 227; expeditious disposal; expedition direction to trial court; decision within stipulated time/time frame; pendency since 2015; Complaint Case No. 2566 of 2015; Sections 420, 406, 323, 504, 506 IPC; P.S. Bisrakh; Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gautam Budh Nagar; unnecessary or long adjournments; certified copy of order; no legal impediment; no opinion on merits; Allahabad High Court; Nand Prabha Shukla, J.; Matter Under Article 227 No. 1217 of 2025; order dated 18.7.2025; petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the court concerned to decide Complaint Case No. 2566 of 2015 as expeditiously as possible, without granting unnecessary or long adjournments to either party, from the date of production of a certified copy of the order, if there is no other legal impediment. ¶8

Dinesh vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶8

Issue for consideration

Whether, in a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the High Court should direct the court concerned to decide Complaint Case No. 2566 of 2015 (Dinesh Vs. Ran Bahadur and Another), pending since 2015 before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gautam Budh Nagar, within a stipulated time or in a time frame.

¶7

Court's answer

The petition was finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned to decide Complaint Case No. 2566 of 2015 as expeditiously as possible, without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to either of the parties.

¶8

Ratio / Principle

The expedition direction operates from the date of production of a certified copy of the order and is subject to there being no other legal impediment.

¶8

Key takeaways

The Court expressly refrained from expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.obiter¶8

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Nand Prabha Shukla, J.), Matters Under Article 227 No. 1217 of 2025, decided 18.7.2025: Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by Dinesh seeking a direction to the court concerned to decide Complaint Case No. 2566 of 2015 (Dinesh Vs. Ran Bahadur and Another) under Sections 420, 406, 323, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Bisrakh, District Gautam Budh Nagar, pending since 2015 before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gautam Budh Nagar, within a stipulated time or in a time frame. Without expressing any opinion on the merits, the petition was finally disposed of with a direction to decide the case as expeditiously as possible, without granting unnecessary or long adjournments to either party, from the date of production of a certified copy of the order, if there is no other legal impediment.

Dinesh v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Mithla Devi vs State of U.P. and Another

Ramhari and 2 Others vs State of U.P.

Km Jyoti vs State of Up and Another

Smt Jyoti and Another vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Saurabh Anand Sharma vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Krishan Kant vs State of U.P. and Another