Writ petition concerning the Panchayati Raj department; counsel stated the petition had become infructuous. The High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous without adjudicating the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 9377 of 2025
Prabhakar Singh
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 6
HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
(Pankaj Bhatia,J.)
September 23, 2025
Praveen
Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Prabhakar Singh
State of U.P. thru Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj Deptt. Lko.
4 Others
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
