Instn. seeks affiliation despite having Pharmacy Council approval. Court referred to identical decision Writ-C No. 7273 of 2025, dismissing the same petition and ordering affiliation within Supreme Court timelines.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
WRIT - C No. - 9200 of 2025
Sarvajanik Pharmacy College Thru. Manager Uday Singh
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Technical Education Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gopal Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Aditi Tripathi, Atul Kumar Dwivedi, Ravi Singh
Court No. - 6
HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
(Pankaj Bhatia,J.)
September 23, 2025
Praveen
Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted affiliation given the precedent set in Writ-C No. 7273 of 2025 regarding affiliation timelines.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Writ-C No. 7273 of 2025Referred¶11
Sarvajanik Pharmacy College Thru. Manager Uday Singh
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Technical Education Lko.
2 Others
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
