Disposed

Virendra Kumar Gupta and 2 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC14 Oct 2025/8784/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the applicants to surrender within three weeks to enable the trial court to decide their bail application expeditiously, in light of Satender Kumar Antil. Coercive action was stayed for three weeks. The application was disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Stay of coercive action for three weeks pending surrender and bail application; direction to decide bail expeditiously.

Virendra Kumar Gupta and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru… — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8784 of 2025

¶3

Virendra Kumar Gupta And 2 Others

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vijay Prakash Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶7

Court No. - 16

¶8

HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶10

The present application has been filed for the following main reliefs:

¶11

"Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned order dated 01.08.2025 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Barabanki in Criminal Revision No.89/2025, titled as Virendra Kumar Gupta and others V/s State of Uttar Pradesh and another and summoning order dated 08.04.2025 in Complaint Case No.916/2023, Mohd. Junaid V/s Virendra Kumar Gupta and others, under section 323, 504, 506, 406 IPC, P.S. Badosarai, District-Barabanki, contained in Annexure No.1 and 2 to this petition, in the interest of justice.

¶12

It is further prayed that this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to quash the entire proceeding of Complaint Case No.916/2023, Mohd. Junaid V/s Virendra Kumar Gupta and others, under section 323, 504, 506, 406 IPC, P.S. Badosarai, District-Barabanki, pending in the court Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 12, Barabanki."

¶13

At the very outset, counsel for the applicants states that applicants will surrender before the trial court and apply for bail. However, he has submitted that applicants may be granted the benefit of the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in

¶14

A482 No. 8784 of 2025

¶15

¶16

(AIR 2022 SC 3386).

¶17

It is, therefore, directed that in case the applicants surrender before the Court below within three weeks from today and prefer bail application, the trial court will decide the said bail application, as expeditiously as possible, taking into account the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra).

¶18

Learned counsel for the applicants also requested for discharge application. He may move the same at the appropriate time.

¶19

For a period of three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case.

¶20

The application stands disposed of .

¶21

(Brij Raj Singh,J.)

¶22

October 14, 2025

¶23

Sachin

¶24

Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Virendra Kumar Gupta and 2 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Virendra Kumar Gupta and 2 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Prabhu Chawla Vs State of U.P.and Anothers.

Manmohan Pandey and 2 Other Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko. and Another

Ajay Kumar and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Govt. Lko. and Another

Jayant Giri and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another

Kamran and 4 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another

Virendra Kumar Gupta and 2 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another