Applicants under Section 482 CrPC sought permission to withdraw their application at the hearing; no objection was raised by the opposite side and the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6858 of 2024
Shushma Devi And Another
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vikas Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Abhinav Singh, Ashwani Kumar Dwivedi
Court No. - 14
HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
(Rajeev Singh,J.)
October 13, 2025
Arpan
Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shushma Devi And Another
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. And Another
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
