PIL alleging irregularities in Gram Panchayat development works was dismissed because the petitioner failed to implead the concerned Gram Panchayats as necessary parties and undertook no research, rendering the petition not maintainable as a public interest litigation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:5017-DB
Court No. - 1
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 66 of 2025
Petitioner :- Mahendra Kumar Tripathi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue U.P. Government Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rehan Aziz,Noor Alam Khan,Touqeer Ahmad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
(Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) (A. R. Masoodi,J.) Order Date :- 27.1.2025
-Amit K-
Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a PIL alleging irregularities in development works by over 100 Gram Panchayats, without impleading them, is maintainable?
Mahendra Kumar Tripathi
State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue U.P. Government Lko.
Attau Rahman Masoodi
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
