Dismissed¶29

Prabhakar Pandey and Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko and Others

Allahabad HC2 Dec 2025/604/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition against FIR dismissed; final report filed after conclusion of investigation; protest petition pending before competent court; Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B & 506 IPC; Case Crime No. 0008/2024 dated 07.1.2024; P.S. Wazirganj, District Lucknow; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; Rajnish Kumar and Zafeer Ahmad, JJ.; order dated December 2, 2025; connected Writ Petition No. 606 of 2024 (Shiv Saran Upadhyay); earlier order dated 17.11.2025 in Writ Petition No. 4948/2024.

What did the court decide?

Since the final report has been filed and none appeared to press or controvert the matter, the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the matter; accordingly the Criminal Misc. Writ Petitions (No. 604 of 2024 and the connected No. 606 of 2024) are dismissed. ¶28

Prabhakar Pandey and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko and Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 604 of 2024

¶3

Prabhakar Pandey And Others

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko And Others

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Rama Kant Dix	it
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: G.A., Ramesh Kumar Singh	Kumar Mishra, Sushil

¶9

Along with :

¶10

1. Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 606 of 2024:

¶11

Shiv Saran Upadhyay and others

¶12

Versus

¶13

State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and others

¶14

Court No. - 10

¶15

HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.

¶16

Case called out. None for the petitioners to press the petition whereas learned AGA and Sri Sushil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the complainant are present.

¶17

These petitions have been filed challenging the F.I.R. dated 07.1.2024 vide Case Crime No.0008/2024, under Section 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B & 506 IPC, Police Station Wazirganj, District Lucknow.

¶18

Learned AGA as well as learned counsel for the complainant submits that the final report in the matter has been filed, therefore, these petitions have rendered infructuous.

¶19

Learned counsel for the complainant also placed before this Court an order dated 17.11.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.4948/2024, which has been disposed of recording the statement at Bar that the investigation has already been concluded and the final report has also been submitted. The order dated 17.11.2025 on reproduction reads as

CRLP No. 604 of 2024

under:-

"1. Rejoinder affidavit, filed today in Court, is taken on record.

¶24

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.

¶25

3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and the final report has also been submitted in favour of the accused persons. Consequent to submission of filing report, petitioner has already preferred a protest petition before the competent court, which is pending disposal.

¶26

4. Learned AGA could not dispute the aforesaid facts.

¶27

5. In view of the statement made, the instant writ petition is finally disposed of with the direction that the competent court shall pass an appropriate order on the protest petition in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible"

¶28

In view of above and since none is present to controvert the aforesaid, it appears that since the final report has been filed, therefore, the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the matter.

¶29

Dismissed accordingly.

¶30

(Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.)

¶31

December 2, 2025

¶32

Akanksha Sri/-

¶33

Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Prabhakar Pandey and Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prabhakar Pandey and Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mohammad Salman Kuraishi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. of Home Civil Sectt. Lko. and Others

Saurabh Kumar Pandey Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Govt. of U.P. Lko. and Others

Smt. Kanchan Rai and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko. and Others

Ram Gopal vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Govt. Lko. and Others

Shiv Saran Upadhyay and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Others

Shiv Saran Upadhyay and Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Others