Dismissed

Brijesh Tripathi and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. and Another

Allahabad HC16 Dec 2025/3750/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal against summons order dismissed. Court quashed criminal case proceedings due to valid compromise between parties verified by trial court despite offenses punishable by up to seven years imprisonment.

What did the court decide?

Proceedings in Case Crime No. 449 of 2011 quashed under sections 147, 148, 323, 504, 506, 452, 336, 427 IPC and others; appeal disposed of.

Brijesh Tripathi and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl… — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3750 of 2024

¶3

Brijesh Tripathi And Another

¶4

.....Appellant(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. And Another .....Respondent(s)

¶7

Counsel for Appellant(s) Counsel for Respondent(s)	: Prem Prakash Singh : G.A., Javed Khan

¶8

Court No. - 27

¶9

HON'BLE RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA, J.

¶10

Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the appellant, is taken on record.

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned A.G.A. for the State as well as learned counsel for respondent no.2 and perused the record.

¶12

Learned counsel for the respondent no.2 submits that the respondent no.2 has filed treasury chalan of Rs. 6250/- dated 11.12.2024 whereby he has refunded the state assistance received by him to State Exchequer in pursuant of the order of this Court dated 03.12.2024.

¶13

Learned counsel for the parties submit that the parties reached a compromise and they are no longer interested to proceed with the criminal case regarding which present appeal has been preferred by the accused persons with the prayer to quash the summoning order dated 04.01.2012 passed by the trial court alongwith entire proceedings of Case Crime No. 449 of 2011 under Sections 147,148, 323, 504, 506, 452, 336, 427 IPC and 7 CLA Act and 3(1) x of SC/ST Act of Police StationJhageerganj, District- Ambedkar Nagar.

¶14

He next submitted that the offenses are punishable with a maximum term of 7 years of imprisonment and there is no embargo in quashing the proceedings of the trial court in terms of compromise arrived between the parties and duly verified by the trial court.

¶15

CRLA No. 3750 of 2024

¶16

¶17

He also submitted that the parties had filed compromise before the trial court which has been duly verified on 22.08.2024 by the trial court in presence of the parties.

¶18

In view of the above, the proceedings in aforesaid case crime, as stated above, are hereby quashed in terms of compromise entered between the parties and duly verified by the trial court.

¶19

The appeal stands disposed of in terms of the compromise.

¶20

(Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.)

¶21

December 16, 2025 dk/

¶22

Digitally signed by :- DEVENDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Brijesh Tripathi and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Brijesh Tripathi and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases