Dismissed¶13

Ori Prasad v. Santosh Sinha A.G.M / Unit Head, I.T.I. Ltd. Mankapur Gonda

Allahabad HC8 Dec 2025/3678/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt Application (Civil) No. 3678 of 2025; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench; Court No. 8; Manish Kumar, J.; decided December 8, 2025; Ori Prasad (applicant); Santosh Sinha, A.G.M/Unit Head, I.T.I. Ltd., Mankapur, Gonda (opposite party); Vibhanshu Srivastava, counsel for applicant; Dwijendra Mishra, counsel/vakalatnama for respondent; compliance of Writ Court judgment and order; payment credited to applicant's account; contempt petition infructuous; dismissed as infructuous; notice discharged.

What did the court decide?

Since the judgment and order passed by the Writ Court has been complied with, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. ¶13

Ori Prasad Vs Santosh Sinha A.G.M / Unit Head, I.T.I. Ltd. Mankapur Gonda — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3678 of 2025

Ori Prasad

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

Santosh Sinha A.G.M / Unit Head, I.T.I. Ltd. Mankapur Gonda

¶7

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vibhanshu Srivastava
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :

¶9

Court No. - 8

¶10

HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.

¶11

Shri Dwijendra Mishra, Advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of respondent, which is taken on record. He has submitted that in compliance of the judgment and order of the Writ Court, the payment has been credited in the account of the applicant and in support of his submission, he has placed document showing that the amount has been credited in the account of the applicant, which is taken on record and the photocopy of the same has also been given to learned counsel for the applicant.

¶12

At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant has very fairly submitted that the judgment and order passed by Writ Court has been complied with and for all practical purposes, the present contempt petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous.

¶13

As such, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous.

¶14

Notice, if any, is hereby discharged.

¶15

December 8, 2025 Ashish

¶16

(Manish Kumar,J.)

¶17

Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ori Prasad v. Santosh Sinha A.G.M / Unit Head, I.T.I. Ltd. Mankapur Gonda

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ori Prasad v. Santosh Sinha A.G.M / Unit Head, I.T.I. Ltd. Mankapur Gonda

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Uma Shankar Gupta Vs Shri Ajeez Ahmad, Director Tech. Edu. Vikas Nagar Kanpur

Chhote Lal Vs Shri Bhanu Prakash Ram Director Udyan Evam Khadya Prasanskaran Lko.

Pati Ram Vs Smt. Subhashini Distt. Prantiya Rakshak Dal and Youth Welfare Officer Ambedkar Nagar

Lakhan Singh Vs Sri Saurabh Babu Prin. Secy. Co. Operative Deptt. Lko. U.P. and 2 Others

Poonam Verma Vs Shri L. Venkateshwarlu Prin. Secy. Deptt. Social Welfare Govt. of U.P. Lko. and Another

Mewalal Gupta Vs Sri Mayuresh Srivastava Civil Judge Senior Division Room NO.15, Sultanpur