Application under Section 482 CrPC to quash FIR and summons. Court held that prima facie allegations disclosed commission of an offence; powers under Section 482 should not be exercised to scrutinize evidence. Relied on Satendra Kumar Antil guidelines for bail, directing lower court to consider bail application without special directions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3052 of 2020
Lalji Mishra
.....Applicant(s)
State Of U.P. And Anr.
Versus .....Opposite Party(s)
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Manish Kumar Tripathi, Rajiv Raman Srivastava, Vivek Kumar Tripathi |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A., Amit Mishra, Piyush Mishra, Shaktipal Rajpal |
Court No. - 29
HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.
A482 No. 3052 of 2020
2
संबंिधत अवर �यायालय को िनद�श जारी कर िदया जाय।
(Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.)
December 9, 2025 S.Mishra
Digitally signed by :- SHASHI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the allegations in the FIR disclose the commission of a cognizable offence?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satendra Kumar Antil v. CBIReferred¶17
Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (Apecial Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021)
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Lalji Mishra
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
