Section 482 CrPC application to quash a complaint case under Sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found the allegations disclose a prima facie criminal case warranting trial and declined to quash, also declining to issue fresh bail directions in view of the Satendra Kumar Antil guidelines.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2166 of 2020
Shivendra @ Ravi And Anr.
.....Applicant(s)
| Versus | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| State Of U.P. And Anr. | .... | .Opposite Party(s) |
|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) Counsel for Opposite Party(s) |
: : |
Dharm Raj Mishra G.A., Indra Pratap Singh, Kumar |
Sandeep |
Court No. - 29
HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.
A482 No. 2166 of 2020
2
जारी की जा सकती है, इसिलए आवेदकगण के जमानत आवेदन प� पर िवचार करने के िलए संबंिधत अवर �यायालय को िनद�श जारी कर िदया जाय।
(Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.)
December 9, 2025
S.Mishra
Digitally signed by :- SHASHI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Should the proceedings under Sections 498A/323/506 IPC and Sections 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act be stayed or quashed under Section 482 CrPC?
Should bail be granted to the applicants given the Satendra Kumar Antil guidelines?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satendra Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherRelied on
Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021)
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Shivendra @ Ravi And Anr.
State Of U.P. And Anr.
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
