Dismissed¶15

Nitin Dutt v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko and 4 Others

Allahabad HC2 Dec 2025/13755/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Article 226 writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; premature challenge; salary stopped for not performing Booth Level Officer (BLO) duties; Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls; order dated 12.11.2025 described as report/recommendation with no final order; liberty to file afresh on arising of cause of action; petitioner Nitin Dutt; respondents State of U.P. through Secretary, Department of Home, Lucknow; Uttar Pradesh; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; Manish Mathur, J.; December 2, 2025.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to petitioner to file afresh, as and when cause of action arises ¶15

Nitin Dutt Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

WRIT - A No. - 13755 of 2025

Nitin Dutt

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And 4 Others

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Anand Singh	Kumar Srivastava, Ajay Kumar, Sukrit
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C.,	Prashant Kumar Singh

¶9

Court No. - 7

¶10

HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.

¶11

Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties 1 to 3 while notice on behalf of opposite parties 4 and 5 has been accepted by Mr. Prashant Kumar Singh, Advocate.

¶12

Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed challenging order dated 12.11.2025 whereby allegedly petitioner's salary has been stopped for not performing duties of Booth Level Officer for the Special Intensive Revision electoral rolls.

¶13

Mr. Ram Pratap Singh Chauhan, learned State Counsel at the very outset has raised a preliminary objection that the order impugned is only in the nature of a report/recommendation with no final orders having been passed till date.

¶14

In view of such objections being raised, learned counsel for petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition in order to challenge any final order, if passed, against petitioner.

¶15

Considering such submission, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to petitioner to file afresh, as and when cause of action arises.

¶16

December 2, 2025

¶17

kvg/-

¶18

(Manish Mathur,J.)

¶19

Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Nitin Dutt v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nitin Dutt v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases