Allowed¶25

Abbas Mehdi v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC16 Dec 2025/10776/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Quashing of FIR on basis of verified compromise between parties — Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, Court No. 11 — Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 10776 of 2025 — Abbas Mehdi v. State of U.P. and 3 others — FIR No. 0276/2025 dated 25.09.2025, Police Station Hazratganj, District Lucknow — Sections 281/352/324(4) BNS — compromise deed dated 18.10.2025 verified by Senior Registrar (report dated 15.11.2025) — parties agreed to end dispute amicably — writ petition allowed, FIR proceedings quashed — Coram: Abdul Moin, J. and Babita Rani, J. — December 16, 2025.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition allowed; the proceedings of FIR No. 0276/2025, U/s-281/352/324(4) BNS, Police Station- Hazratganj, District- Lucknow, quashed. ¶25

Abbas Mehdi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10776 of 2025

Abbas Mehdi

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Avinash Pratap Singh
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: G.A., Istekhaf

¶9

Court No. - 11

¶10

HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondents no.1-3, and Shri Istekhaf, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.4.

¶12

Instant petition has been filed with the following prayer:

¶13

"(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the impugned First Information Report dated 25.09.2025 in FIR No. 0276/2025, U/s-281/352/324(4) BNS, Police Station- Hazratganj, DistrictLucknow, contained as Annexure No. I to this writ petition.

¶14

(ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the Opposite Party No.2 & 3 not to give effect and proceed further in pursuance to the First Information Report dated 25.09.2025 in FIR No. 0276/2025, U/s-281/352/324(4) BNS, Police Station- Hazratganj, District- Lucknow, contained as Annexure No.1 to this writ petition.

¶15

(iii) issue an ad interim Mandamus to the effect that the Petitioners be not arrested in pursuance of the First Information Report dated 25.09.2025 in FIR No. 0276/2025, U/s-281/352/324(4) BNS, Police Station- Hazratganj, District- Lucknow, contained as Annexure No.1 to this writ petition.

¶16

(iv) issue any other appropriate order or direction in favor of the Petitioners as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the

¶17

CRLP No. 10776 of 2025

¶18

¶19

case.

¶20

(v) Allow the Writ Petition in favor of the Petitioners."

¶21

Upon filing of the petition, it was contended that the petitioner and respondents have entered into a compromise vide the compromise deed dated 18.10.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-2 to the petition.

¶22

This Court vide order dated 02.12.2025 had required the compromise deed to be placed before the learned Senior Registrar of this Court for verification of the said compromise.

¶23

In pursuance to the order of this Court dated 15.11.2025, the Senior Registrar of this Court vide his report dated 15.11.2025 has verified the compromise between the petitioners and respondents.

¶24

As per the said compromise, the petitioners and respondents have agreed to end the dispute between themselves amicably.

¶25

Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is allowed. The proceedings of FIR No. 0276/2025, U/s-281/352/324(4) BNS, Police Station- Hazratganj, District- Lucknow, are hereby quashed.

¶26

(Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.)

¶27

December 16, 2025

¶28

V. Sinha

¶29

Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Abbas Mehdi v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abbas Mehdi v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases