Allowed¶19

Vinod Pratap Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Chief Secy. and 4 Others

Allahabad HC19 Nov 2025/10758/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Vinod Pratap Singh v. State of U.P. thru Chief Secy. and 4 Others; WRIT-C No. 10758 of 2025; Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench; decided 19 November 2025; District Magistrate, Sant Kabir Nagar order dated 15 February 2008 barring authorities from entertaining petitioner's complaints; no legal provision for such blanket restraint; infringement of fundamental rights under Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution; quashing of administrative order; writ petition allowed.

What did the court decide?

Quashing of the order dated 15th February, 2008 passed by the District Magistrate, Sant Kabir Nagar. ¶19

Vinod Pratap Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Chief Secy. and 4 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

WRIT - C No. - 10758 of 2025

Vinod Pratap Singh

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. Thru. Chief Secy. And 4 Others

¶7

		...	..Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Manoj Shukla	Kumar Gupta,	Rajesh Kumar
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C.

¶8

Court No. - 3

¶9

HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.

¶10

Heard Shri Manoj Kumar Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.

¶11

The captioned writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 15th February, 2008 passed by the District Magistrate, Sant Kabir Nagar, whereby the general directions have been issued to the authorities not to entertain any compliant filed by the petitioner.

¶12

It has been argued on behalf of the petitioner that there is no such provision under any law, under which the District Magistrate, Sant Kabir Nagar can pass such an order thereby restraining the authorities from entertaining any complaint filed by the petitioner.

¶13

Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State, on being confronted, could not point out any provision under any law, which authorizes the District Magistrate to pass such an order.

¶14

We have considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsels appearing for the parties and we find that there is no provision under which District Magistrate, Sant Kabir Nagar can pass a blanket order, thereby directing the authorities of the district not to entertain any complaint filed by the petitioner. We also find that by means of the directions issued under the order impugned in this writ petition, the valuable rights of the petitioner have been infringed including his

¶15

WRIC No. 10758 of 2025

¶16

¶17

fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

¶18

In view of the aforesaid reasons, the order dated 15th February, 2008 passed by the District Magistrate, Sant Kabir Nagar is hereby quashed.

¶19

Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed.

¶20

(Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.)

¶21

November 19, 2025 Ashutosh

¶22

Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Vinod Pratap Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Chief Secy. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod Pratap Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Chief Secy. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Saroja Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. and 2 Others

Ram Sinhasan Maurya Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Revenue Lko and 2 Others

Raj Kumar Singh and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. and 10 Others

Rajendra Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Deptt. of Panchayati Raj ) Lko. and 7 Others

Renu Gupta Vs State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Transport Lko. and 2 Others

Kusama Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. and 2 Others