Petition challenging the selection of a candidate as Anganwadi Worker, alleging she resided in another village. Court noted her selection relied on an uncancelled Domicile Certificate and directed the authority to expedite decision on its cancellation with hearing to her.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
WRIT - A No. - 10530 of 2025
Manju Devi
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Bal Vikas Evam Pushtahar Vibhag Lucknow And 4 Others
Pushtahar Vibhag Lucknow And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dr. Surendra Kumar Misra, Avnish Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 8
HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
WRIA No. 10530 of 2025
2
(Manish Mathur,J.)
September 12, 2025
kvg/-
Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether selection of opposite party no.5 as Anganwadi Worker based on a Domicile Certificate was valid despite claims she resides in another village?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manju Devi
State of U.P. thru Prin. Secy. Bal Vikas Evam Pushtahar Vibhag Lucknow
Ankita Devi
Manish Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
