Ashish Pandey v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home, Lucknow and 2 Others
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 20
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8356 of 2024
Petitioner :- Ashish Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home, Lucknow And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Paavan Awasthi,Gaurav Mehrotra,Parth Anand,Prashast Puri Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
- Respondent nos. 1 to 3 are represented by learned Standing Counsel.
- Learned Standing Counsel prays for and is granted three weeks' time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit may be filed within one week thereafter.
- List on 04.11.2024.
Order Date :- 26.9.2024 Ved Prakash
(Manish Kumar Nigam,J.)
Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ashish Pandey
- respondent
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home, Lucknow
- respondent
2 Others
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/8356/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Subhash Vidyarthi
- Order 2 · Subhash Vidyarthi
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Mewa Lal Gautam vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Govt. Lko.
M/S Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd. Thru Authorized Signatory Rakesh Kumar Mishra vs M/S Veena Traders Thru Sole Proprietor Manvendra Pratap Singh
Prince Nigam vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. and Another
Pinku @ Mustakeem @ Irfan vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lucknow