In this writ petition for compensation arising from an electrocution incident, the High Court listed the matter for filing a counter affidavit and rejoinder, fixing the next hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8042 of 2024
Petitioner :- Sandeep Kumar Yadav And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Energy Lko. And 7 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Piyush Shrivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Amarjeet Singh Rakhra
Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra, J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J.
"Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding the respondents to compensate the victim's family i.e. the petitioners with such justifiable and reasonable amount which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and necessary in the interest of justice, at the earliest."
.
(Brij Raj Singh, J.) (Sangeeta Chandra, J.) Order Date :- 18.9.2024 Rao/-
Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to compensation from the respondents for the death of the victim.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kaneez Fatima Vs State of U.P.Referred¶10
Writ-C No.25065 of 2022, Kaneez Fatima Vs State of U.P. and 3 others, (2023) 3 ALJ 63
Sandeep Kumar Yadav And 4 Others
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Energy
Sangeeta Chandra
Brij Raj Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
