Petitioner sought protection from police threats. State argued writ became infructuous due to an existing criminal case against petitioner no. 2. Court dismissed the writ as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:120040
Court No. - 80
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8013 of 2024
Petitioner :- Smt Shivangi Yadav And Another Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Alakshendra Pratap,Priyanka Singh,Sheel Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
Order Date :- 26.7.2024
Ujjawal
(Vinod Diwakar, J.)
Digitally signed by :- UJJAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Shivangi Yadav
Another
State Of Up
3 Others
Vinod Diwakar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
