Writ petition seeking refund of insurance premium from a private company was dismissed as not maintainable. The court held the petitioner must avail statutory remedies applicable to private entities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:70584-DB
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7740 of 2024
Petitioner :- Baboo Ram Yadav Respondent :- Bank Of Baroda Branch Payagipur Distt. Sultanpur Thru. Branch Manager And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sushil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- Prashant Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
"i) to issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding and directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner and refund the amount deposited by the petitioner in policy no. 70395470 (contained as Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition) along with the applicable interest to the petitioner, in in the interest of justice.
ii) to issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to take appropriate decision on the representation made by the petitioner contained as Annexure No.4 to this petition, in the interest of justice."
(Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.)
Order Date :- 21.10.2024 R.K.P.
Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition is maintainable to command a private insurance company to refund deposit installments.
Baboo Ram Yadav
Bank Of Baroda Branch Payagipur Distt. Sultanpur Thru. Branch Manager
2 Others
Rajan Roy
Brij Raj Singh
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
