Horilal v. State of U.P. Thru. Commissioner and Secy. Board of Revenue Lko and Others
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6562 of 2024
Petitioner :- Horilal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Commissioner And Secy. Board Of Revenue Lko And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Naresh Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Zafar Aziz
Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for the State-respondents and Sri Zafar Aziz, learned counsel who appears for the respondent no.4.
Let counter affidavits be filed by the respondents within a period of four weeks.
Two weeks thereafter is given to the petitioner to file rejoinder affidavit.
List this matter on 12.9.2024.
Order Date :- 1.8.2024 Ram Murti
Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Horilal
- respondent
State Of U.P. Thru. Commissioner And Secy. Board Of Revenue Lko And Others
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/6562/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
M/S Amita Industries Thru. Proprietor and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Food and Civil Supplies Civil Secrt. Lko. and Others
Prin. Commissioner Cgst and Central Excise , Lucknow vs M/S Meatek Food and Machineries India Pvt. Ltd. , Lucknow
Ram Kishor and Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Civil Secy. Lko. and Others
Ali Sher and Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Public Works Deptt. U.P. Govt. Lko. and Others