The petitioners' learned counsel stated that the impugned order was complied with. The High Court held the writ petition infructuous and dismissed it.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:72047
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6292 of 2024
Petitioner :- Shamim Fatima And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Labour Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sharad Nandan Ojha,Akhand Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Zafar Aziz
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
Learned counsel for the parties state that the order has been complied with, as such, the matter is rendered infructuous.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 25.10.2024 Arun
Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Shamim Fatima And 3 Others
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Labour Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others
Pankaj Bhatia
Arun
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
