Vijay Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lucknow and Others
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 8
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4543 of 2024
Petitioner :- Vijay Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar,Aditya Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
As per office report dated 26.06.2024, service upon private respondent nos.6 to 11 is not sufficient.
Learned counsel for the petitioner shall take fresh steps within a week returnable at an early date.
List after service.
In case, if the steps are not taken, the matter shall be listed under appropriate head immediately after expiry of the aforesaid period.
Order Date :- 22.7.2024 Harshita
Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vijay Kumar
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Jaspreet Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/4543/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Jaspreet Singh
- Order 2 · Jaspreet Singh
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Dr. Swati Agarwal and 2 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Institutional Finance Lko. and 3 Others
Ansal Housing and Construction, New Delhi Thru. Director Shri. Maharaj Kisan Trishal vs Electricity Ombudsman, Lucknow Thru. Lokpal and Others
Usman @ Pasha and Another vs State of U.P. Thru.Prin.Secy. Home
Ejaj Ahmad vs State of U.P. Thru.the Prin.Secy.Home