Writ petition seeking allotment of 6% developed land in lieu of acquired land, relying on a Supreme Court judgment. Petition disposed of with liberty to make fresh representation for a speaking order.
Liberty to make fresh representation before respondent no. 3 within two weeks for a speaking decision within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:186299-DB
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
(Sl.No. 32)
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39207 of 2024
Petitioner :- Ramveer Yadav And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pankaj Dubey,Rishu Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- Anjali Upadhya,C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.
Order Date :- 27.11.2024 Kirti
(Anish Kumar Gupta, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Digitally signed by :- SMT KIRTI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's claim for allotment of developed land in lieu of acquired land needs to be considered on merits immediately.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ramesh Chandra Sharma & others vs. State of U.P. & othersReferred¶9
Ramesh Chandra Sharma & others vs. State of U.P. & others; 2023 SCC OnLine SC 162 · Who else cites this
Ramveer Yadav and 2 Others
State Of Up and 2 Others
Manoj Kumar Gupta
Anish Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
