Petitioner sought writ mandamus for fair compensation for land acquired by PWD for road widening. The court observed that the petitioner could not be forced to give consent and compulsory acquisition was the legal route if required, then disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:186163-DB
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
*********
(Sl.No. 29)
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39190 of 2024 Petitioner :- Jagmohan Ojha Respondent :- State Of Up And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.
Order Date :- 27.11.2024 Kirti
(Anish Kumar Gupta, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Digitally signed by :- SMT KIRTI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the State should be commanded to pay fair compensation for the petitioner's land acquired by PWD for road widening.
Whether the petitioner's representation dated 25.10.2024 regarding compensation rates should be decided.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jagmohan Ojha
State Of Up
Manoj Kumar Gupta
Anish Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
