The petitioner filed a vague writ petition regarding land acquisition. The court dismissed the petition for lack of particulars regarding the legal basis and the acquisition award, allowing a fresh petition.
Petition dismissed with liberty to file fresh petition with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:174658-DB
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 33806 of 2024
Petitioner :- Sarita Pandey Respondent :- State Of Up And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ganesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.
Order Date :- 7.11.2024 Mukesh Kr.
(Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.)
Digitally signed by :- MUKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is maintainable without disclosing the provisions of law under which acquisition was made and without annexing the award.
Sarita Pandey
State Of Up
Manoj Kumar Gupta
Anish Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
