Satish Kumar v. State of Up and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment order in a writ petition; ten days granted to the State to obtain instructions and case listed fresh.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 33
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 32877 of 2024
Petitioner :- Satish Kumar Respondent :- State Of Up And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jay Prakash Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rameshwar Prasad Shukla
Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
Learned Standing Counsel prays for and is granted ten days' time to obtain instructions.
List this case as fresh on 19.12.2024.
Order Date :- 28.11.2024 K.K. Maurya
Digitally signed by :- KAMLESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Satish Kumar
- respondent
State Of Up
Coram
Vikram D. Chauhan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIC/32877/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Vikram D Chauhan
- Order 2 · Vikram D Chauhan
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court