Single judge order dismissing the writ petition for want of prosecution after noting that the petitioners failed to file an application for substitution despite a prior direction to do so.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:4667
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3000100 of 2003
Petitioner :- Ayodhya Prasad And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thr. Collector Bahraich And Others 5
Counsel for Petitioner :- S.K.Tewari,Alok Kr. Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Brij Raj Tripathi,Rajiv Kumar Tripathi,Sunder Lal,Vivek Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
(Alok Mathur, J.)
Order Date :- 17.1.2024 Virendra
Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ayodhya Prasad
Another
State Of U.P.
Thr. Collector Bahraich
Alok Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
