which he deserves to be excluded, on three acres a Nala exists and remaining land is constantly under-water (Jalmagn), consequently, the aforesaid land deserves to be excluded from the holding of the petitioner. The Prescribed Authority duly considered the objections filed by the petitioner and rejected the same. With regard to existence of a Nala in Gram Rasoolpur, he returned a finding that no documents has been placed by the petitioner, which could demonstrate existence of Nala and even in the revenue records, the said land was not shown as a Nala and relied upon the statement of the Ram Kishore Verma, Lekhpal and rejected the contentions of the petitioner. The second issue was considered with regard to the existence of an Abadi on one acre land. In this regard, he relied upon the statement of Lekhpal Ram Kishore Verma, who admitted that on Gata No. 62 Kha/0.044 and Gata No. 186 Kha/0.025 hectare, Gata No. 189/0.014 hectare total of 0.083 hectare and Abadi exists, which is also demonstrated in relevant revenue records pertaining to Fasali 1412 and held that the benefit of the same has already been given to the petitioner.
