Disposed¶10

Kaval Kishor v. State of U.P. and 14 Others

Allahabad HC28 Jul 2024WRIC/24204/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Time-bound disposal direction to subordinate revenue authority; Section 207 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 appeal; pendency/delay since 2023; Deputy District Magistrate, Bhatparrani, Tehsil Bhatparrani, District Deoria; six-month timeline from production of certified copy; writ disposed of, no opinion on merits; notice on private respondents dispensed with; Neutral Citation 2024:AHC:121789; Court No. 50; Order Date 29.7.2024.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Respondent No. 2, Deputy District Magistrate, Bhatparrani, Tehsil Bhatparrani, District Deoria, to decide Appeal No. T202305200501831 expeditiously, preferably within six months from the date of production of certified copy of the order, strictly in accordance with law. ¶10

Kaval Kishor Vs State of U.P. and 14 Others — Allahabad HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:121789

¶2

Court No. - 50

¶3

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 24204 of 2024 Petitioner :- Kaval Kishor Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 14 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Mishra,Vinay Kumar Mishra

¶4

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶5

Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State Respondents.

¶7

Considering the nature of the order proposed to be passed notice upon the private respondents is hereby dispensed with.

¶8

At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his appeal bearing Appeal No. T202305200501831 (Santosh and Another Versus Musafir and Others), under Section 207 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, is pending consideration before the Respondent No. 2-Deputy District Magistrate, Bhatparrani, Tehsil, Bhatparrani, District Deoria and the purpose of filing present writ petition shall stand served if the appropriate directions are issued to the Respondent No. 2 to conclude and decide the appeal of the petitioner pending since the year 2023, within the time frame fixed by this Court.

¶9

Learned counsel representing the respondents have no objection the aforesaid proposition.

¶10

This Court is also of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the writ petition pending and the same is accordingly disposed of by requiring the Respondent No. 2- Deputy District Magistrate, Bhatparrani, Tehsil, Bhatparrani, District Deoria, seized with the Appeal No. T202305200501831 to consider and decide the appeal expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months, from the date of production of certified copy of order of this Court, strictly in accordance with law.

¶11

Needless to say that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and it shall be open for the Respondent No. 2 to pass appropriate orders, strictly in accordance with law.

¶12

Order Date :- 29.7.2024/VS

¶13

Digitally signed by :- VIBHA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Kaval Kishor v. State of U.P. and 14 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kaval Kishor v. State of U.P. and 14 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases