Disposed

Jagnarayan v. State of U.P. and 6 Others

Allahabad HC28 Jul 2024WRIC/24202/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking expedited adjudication of the petitioner's pending case under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 before the Up-Ziladhikari, Handia. Court disposed of the petition directing decision within six months without expressing any opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Respondent No. 2-UpZiladhikari, Handia, District Prayagraj to decide Case No. 8407 of 2022 within six months in accordance with law.

Jagnarayan Vs State of U.P. and 6 Others — Property and Title | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:121797

¶2

Court No. - 50

¶3

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 24202 of 2024 Petitioner :- Jagnarayan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sushil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- Azad Rai,C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State Respondents.

¶6

Considering the nature of the order proposed to be passed notice upon the private respondents is hereby dispensed with.

¶7

At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his case bearing Case No. 8407 of 2022 (Computerized Case No. T202202030408407) "Jagnarayan Vs. Raj Narayan & Others", under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, is pending consideration before the Respondent No. 2-Up-Ziladhikari, Handia, District Prayagraj and the purpose of filing present writ petition shall stand served if the appropriate directions are issued to the Respondent No. 2 to conclude and decide the case of the petitioner pending since the year 2022, within the time frame fixed by this Court.

¶8

Learned counsel representing the respondents have no objection the aforesaid proposition.

¶9

This Court is also of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the writ petition pending and the same is accordingly disposed of by requiring the Respondent No. 2-UpZiladhikari, Handia, District Prayagraj, seized with the Case No. 8407 of 2022 (Computerized Case No. T202202030408407) to consider and decide the case expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months, from the date of production of certified copy of order of this Court, strictly in accordance with law.

¶10

Needless to say that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and it shall be open for the Respondent No. 2 to pass appropriate orders, strictly in accordance with law.

¶11

Order Date :- 29.7.2024/VS

¶12

Digitally signed by :- VIBHA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Jagnarayan v. State of U.P. and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jagnarayan v. State of U.P. and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases