Disposable order declining interference in revenue orders regarding name erasure from records. Court directed petitioner to avail revisional remedy under the U.P. Revenue Code instead.
Petitioner directed to use revisional remedy; certified copy to be returned subject to filing copy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:134036
Court No. - 52
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 22814 of 2024
Petitioner :- Prem Kumar And Another Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shri Prakash Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pradeep Singh
Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J.
Order Date :- 21.8.2024 Sharad/-
(Vikas Budhwar,J.)
Digitally signed by :- SHARAD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with orders erasing names from revenue record instead of directing the petitioner to use revisional jurisdiction.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Prem Kumar
Prem Kumar And Another
State Of Up
3 Others
Vikas Budhwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
