The High Court held that the writ petition was premature. It directed the respondent corporation to allow a detail reply, grant an opportunity of hearing, and pass a reasoned order within six weeks before any third party rights are created. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:120063-DB
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 19715 of 2024
Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Vishwakarma Respondent :- Indian Oil Corporation Limited And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sushil Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rituraj Singh
Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Manjive Shukla,J.
Order Date :- 26.7.2024 Kuldeep
(Manjive Shukla, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition of the petitioner challenging a procedural decision was premature.
Ashok Kumar Vishwakarma
Indian Oil Corporation Limited
2 Others
Shekhar B. Saraf
Manjive Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
